/* Pop-up definition*/

'Science'

China: Animals behave abnormally after earthquake

Tuesday, May 13th, 2008

It is often said that animals can sense a coming earthquake. Is there any truth in this? How did animals behave before, during and after the Sichuan earthquake? A Xinhua reporter visited the Chengdu Zoo in search of answers.

At 6:30 PM on May12, the reporter arrived at the zoo, the city having experienced an earthquake that afternoon. No visitors were to be seen, but things were still very noisy because of the unusual behavior of the animals.

Some places in the zoo were quiet; others not at all. In the Parrot House the birds were squawking in an unusual manner. They seemed very anxious and were struggling to escape.

Mr. Wu, the zoo’s Breeder of Birds, spoke about what had happened in the afternoon: “The Bird House began to shake violently at about 2 o’clock in the afternoon, which made the baby parrots and peacocks flee in disorder. Fortunately the door was closed, or else they would have escaped.”

“Inside the Penguin House, the water in the pool suddenly began to churn and the frightened penguins had no idea where to run”, Wu said.

In the Orangutan House, the tame orangutans become violent, using all their strength to bang on the door and shake the iron chains.

Many keepers in the zoo said there were no abnormal signs before the earthquake. “Only after the earthquake, some animals behaved very unusually. I’ve never seen them like this before”, Wu said.

The zoo has already adopted emergency measures to ensure the safety of the animals. Big animals such as elephant, hippopotamus and giraffe have been removed from their glass cages to safer places. All the animals are secure, and no problems have been reported in Chengdu’s panda breeding research base.

Source: http://www.china.org.cn/environment/news/2008-05/13/content_15193679.htm

(China.org.cn by Xiang Bin, May 13, 2008)

Confirman en Chimpancés y Orangutanes una Relación Entre la Dieta y el Tipo de Dentadura

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

Por primera vez, unos antropólogos han medido las propiedades mecánicas de los alimentos consumidos por los orangutanes y chimpancés en estado salvaje, para comprobar las suposiciones sobre el vínculo entre la dieta y la dentadura de los primates.

Los resultados de su investigación confirman lo que los científicos habían supuesto y proporcionan los primeros datos que establecen la correlación de las gruesas capas de esmalte de los orangutanes con una dieta de alimentos duros. Los resultados tienen implicaciones importantes en los estudios sobre la dieta de los primeros ancestros humanos, porque los antropólogos ya se habían percatado desde hace tiempo de la similitud entre la dentadura de los homínidos y la de los orangutanes, las cuales parecen haber evolucionado de manera independiente hacia dientes con una gruesa capa de esmalte y bien adaptados al consumo de alimentos duros.

El nuevo estudio establece una correlación entre las diferencias presentes en las dentaduras de los chimpancés y de los orangutanes, y las diferencias presentes en sus dietas.

Los orangutanes tienen una gruesa capa de esmalte en su dentadura y crestas a lo largo de las cuencas de sus molares, en comparación con los chimpancés, que tienen una capa de esmalte mucho más fina.

Los investigadores han especulado durante años sobre la función de esta morfología divergente, pero nunca nadie había medido las propiedades mecánicas de los alimentos que consumen estos animales cuando viven en libertad.

Trabajando sobre el terreno, la investigadora Erin Vogel y su colaborador Nathaniel J. Dominy, ambos de la Universidad de California en Santa Cruz, examinaron sistemáticamente los alimentos consumidos por los orangutanes y los chimpancés, teniendo en cuenta su dureza y su consistencia. Su análisis ha desvelado los rasgos distintivos que establecen la correlación con las diferencias morfológicas de las dentaduras de ambas especies.

El estudio se ha nutrido de los datos reunidos por Vogel durante el periodo de casi un año que ella pasó observando 21 orangutanes en Borneo, y de los datos reunidos por Dominy sobre chimpancés en Uganda. Vogel y Dominy utilizaron una nueva tecnología de ingeniería estandarizada para estudiar las propiedades de los alimentos y obtuvieron datos técnicos que son plenamente comparables a través de continentes diferentes. Esto constituye un avance significativo con respecto a estudios anteriores sobre los alimentos consumidos por los monos.

Aunque los orangutanes y los chimpancés prefieren comer frutas maduras, buscan otras fuentes de sustento cuando la fruta no está disponible. Esos alimentos secundarios varían considerablemente y de maneras tales que podrían explicar por qué sus dentaduras evolucionaron de modos tan diferentes.

Los hallazgos indican que esos alimentos secundarios pueden haber ejercido una presión selectiva en la evolución de los dientes.

Los resultados de esta investigación son importantes a la hora de inferir la dieta de los primeros ancestros humanos, y proporcionan datos comparativos de gran valor para que los investigadores exploren las dietas de los homínidos. Los investigadores saben que los primeros ancestros humanos tenían una capa de esmalte más gruesa, así como mandíbulas muy robustas, y, según indica este estudio, podían haber sido adaptaciones para comer alimentos más duros, incluyendo partes subterráneas de vegetales.

Fuente: http://www.amazings.com/ciencia/noticias/300408c.html

Earth in crisis, warns NASA’s top climate scientist

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

By Rita Farrell
Mon Apr 7

Global warming has plunged the planet into a crisis and the fossil fuel industries are trying to hide the extent of the problem from the public, NASA’s top climate scientist says.

“We’ve already reached the dangerous level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere,” James Hansen, 67, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, told AFP here.

“But there are ways to solve the problem” of heat-trapping greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, which Hansen said has reached the “tipping point” of 385 parts per million.

In a paper he was submitting to Science magazine on Monday, Hansen calls for phasing out all coal-fired plants by 2030, taxing their emissions until then, and banning the building of new plants unless they are designed to trap and segregate the carbon dioxide they emit.

The major obstacle to saving the planet from its inhabitants is not technology, insisted Hansen, named one of the world’s 100 most influential people in 2006 by Time magazine.

“The problem is that 90 percent of energy is fossil fuels. And that is such a huge business, it has permeated our government,” he maintained.

“What’s become clear to me in the past several years is that both the executive branch and the legislative branch are strongly influenced by special fossil fuel interests,” he said, referring to the providers of coal, oil and natural gas and the energy industry that burns them.

In a recent survey of what concerns people, global warming ranked 25th.

“The industry is misleading the public and policy makers about the cause of climate change. And that is analogous to what the cigarette manufacturers did. They knew smoking caused cancer, but they hired scientists who said that was not the case.”

Hansen says that with an administration and legislature that he believes are “well oiled, our best hope is the judicial branch.”

Last year Hansen testified before the US Congress that “interference with communication of science to the public has been greater during the current administration than at any time in my career.”

Government public relations officials, he said, filter the facts in science reports to reduce “concern about the relation of climate change to human-made greenhouse gas emissions.”

While he recognizes that he has stepped outside the traditional role of scientists as researchers rather than as public policy advocates, he says he does so because “in this particular situation we’ve reached a crisis.”

The policy makers, “the people who need to know are ignorant of the actual status of the matter, and the gravity of the matter, and most important, the urgency of the matter,” he charged.

“It’s analogous to an engineer who sees that there’s a flaw in the space shuttle before it is to be launched. You don’t have any choice. You have to say something. That’s really all that I’m doing,” he explained.

Hansen was in Wilmington to receive a 50,000 dollar Common Wealth Award for outstanding achievement, along with the former prime minister of Australia John Howard, the US actress Glenn Close, and NBC news anchor Ann Curry.

The awards are provided by a trust of the late Ralph Hayes, a former director of Coca Cola and Bank of Delaware, now PNC. In 29 years, 165 former honorees in seven fields have included former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger, former US newsman Walter Cronkite, French marine biologist Jacques-Yves Cousteau and Colombian author Gabriel Garcia Marquez.

Howard, who would not sign the Kyoto protocol when he was in office, told AFP: “I thought it was the right policy at the time because the major emitters” were not on board.”

He added: “You need a new Kyoto protocol with all the major emitters committed to it. Then you are cooking with gas.”

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080407/sc_afp/usclimateenvironmentnasa_080407051048;_ylt=AsRMgpnbVV.ZCLxRXfaLWQvPOrgF

Apes were the first doctors

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

Please visit the source of this article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/

Evidence has emerged that humans learned the medicinal properties of soil and plants from fellow primates. Roger Highfield reports

When we look back at the history of medicine, we think of the clever people who have, over thousands of years, devised ingenious ways of allaying human suffering.

But to find the real fathers of the healing arts, we should look millions of years further back - to our hairy relatives.

The standard account of medicine says that Hippocrates (460-370BC) introduced reason to treatment. The first pharmacopoeia, De Materia Medica - a list of 600 drugs - is attributed to Dioscorides in AD65.

And the “father of pharmacy” was another Greek, Claudius Galenus, who became surgeon to the gladiators in second-century Rome.

Recently, research by a team from the University of Manchester, led by Prof Rosalie David, put back the birth of medicine by another millennium.

They claimed that the pioneers of the healing arts were not the ancient Greeks but the ancient Egyptians, in particular, the likes of Imhotep (2667-2648BC), who designed the pyramids at Saqqara and was elevated to a god of healing.

Egyptian doctors treated wounds with honey, resins and metals which are now known to have antimicrobial action.

For constipation, they used laxatives of castor oil, colocynth (a bitter fruit), figs and bran. For indigestion, they prescribed an antacid of powdered limestone (calcium carbonate), while we take magnesium carbonate. Cumin and coriander were used to relieve flatulence, celery and saffron for rheumatism, and pomegranate to eradicate tapeworms.

Now, the textbooks may have to be rewritten again - because evidence is emerging that medicine is not a human invention at all. In fact, we ape animals.

An example is the deliberate ingestion of soil, known as “geophagy”. In people, it is thought to signal mental health problems. But according to a study of chimpanzees in the Kibale National Park in Uganda, it turns out to be a remedy.

Consuming a particular kind of soil, as Sabrina Krief and her colleagues at the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris reported recently in the journal Naturwissenschaften, increases the potency of ingested plants, such as the leaves of trichilia rubescens, which have anti-malarial properties.

Her team collected earth eaten by chimpanzees, as well as leaves from young T. rubescens trees in the same area. All the soil was rich in the clay mineral kaolinite, the principal component of many anti-diarrhoea medicines.

Clays can bind mycotoxins (fungal toxins), endotoxins (internal toxins secreted by pathogens), man-made toxic chemicals, bacteria and viruses. They also act as an antacid and absorb excess fluids.

The scientists replicated the effects of mastication, gastric and intestinal digestion in the laboratory and were surprised. Before being mixed with the soil, the digested leaves had no significant effects.

However, when the leaves and soil were digested together, the mixture developed clear anti-malarial properties. “This overlapping use by humans and apes is interesting from both evolutionary and conservation perspectives,” says Krief. “Saving apes and their forests is also important for human health.”

This is far from the first example of our borrowing from other species - indeed, Prof Michael Huffman, of Kyoto University, believes humans have long looked to other animals for medicinal wisdom.

In 1987, he happened to be watching a constipated chimpanzee called Chausiku in the dense rainforest of the Mahale mountains in western Tanzania.

Reaching for the shoot of a noxious tree that chimps would normally avoid, Chausiku peeled it and sucked its bitter pith. Within a day, her constipation was gone. It was the first time a scientist had seen a sick chimp select an unsavoury plant known by humans to have medicinal properties, and then recover.

The pith, from the tree Vernonia amygdalina, has now given up its secrets. It contains compounds active against many of the parasites responsible for malaria, dysentery and schistosomiasis.

The shrub is poisonous and called mjonso - “strong medicine” - by the local people, the WaTongwe. But what is fascinating is that they use the same plant to treat the same illnesses - and take the same time to recover.

Prof Huffman has found that nearly all of the ape remedies he has studied are also used by local people as medicine - echoing, he believes, the evolutionary origins of human medicine.

For more evidence, take a remarkable type of self-medication first seen among chimpanzees in Tanzania. Jane Goodall, the veteran ape watcher, spotted chimps swallowing leaves in Gombe Stream National Park in the Sixties, which she then studied with Richard Wrangham, of Harvard University.

What is remarkable is that leaf-swallowing peaks in many sites about two months after the rainy season has begun - about the same time as the peak of infection with Oesophagostomum stephanostomum, a nodular worm which is linked with bacterial infection, diarrhoea, severe stomach pain, weight loss, and weakness, resulting in high mortality.

Prof Huffman has shown that individual leaves from any of 34 different plants are swallowed whole by chimpanzees, bonobos and gorillas across Africa - but that it tends to be only the sick chimps that will swallow leaves, and that they do so on an empty stomach.

He was particularly excited to stumble upon a freshly deposit of chimpanzee dung filled with these swallowed leaves, in which live parasitic worms had been entrapped in the hairy folds. (When not chewed, the leaves are flushed out of the system within six hours in a laxative-like action.)

But self-medication is not confined to chimps. At Bwindi Impenetrable Park and Mgahinga National Park in Uganda, mountain gorillas chew the bark of the nondescript Dombeya tree as a food.

The bark is laden with active ingredients, including antibiotics that kill common bacteria such as E. coli, and there is anecdotal evidence that the presence of bugs in gorilla dung matches the ape’s Dombeya-eating patterns. In southern Mexico, howler monkeys eat figs that can fight parasite infections.

It is not just curative medicine that was invented by our animal relatives, but preventative, too. Baboons living near the city of Taif, Saudia Arabia, are known to dig drinking holes in the sand directly adjacent to the murky, algae-tainted watering sites of livestock.

To ensure the water does not make them sick, they “patiently wait for the filtered water to seep through the sand,” says Prof Huffman.

Monkeys also resort to aromatherapy. When capuchins rub each other’s fur on the Nicoya Peninsula of Costa Rica they use citrus fruits, notably lemons, limes and oranges, during the rainy season.

Either applied directly, or mixed with saliva, the citrus oils help fight bacterial and fungal infections and repel insects. Their cousins in central Venezuela, the weeper capuchins, like to anoint themselves with the secretions of millipedes, which act as an antiseptic and repel mosquitoes and ticks.

Apes may even resort to recreational drugs. They eat the seeds of Kola (cola) trees, thought to be a pick-me-up of the kind found in coffee.

Two hallucinogenic plants are ingested by gorillas in Equatorial Guinea and by chimpanzees in the Republic of Guinea: Alchornea floribunda and A. cordifolia (Euphorbiaceae).

The apes even resort to eating the root of Tabernanthe iboga, which contains a chemical called ibogaine which has been studied by doctors for use in detox therapies.

Some have said that human medicine is true medicine because we organise and teach it. But Prof Huffmann has seen a young chimp watch its sick mother take medicine, before trying it itself.

For Prof Andrew Whiten, of St Andrews, an expert on ape culture, it is easy to conclude that the animals can learn symptoms, medicines and dosages from their peers.

Take the use of Vernonia amygdalina, the constipation-countering shrub mentioned above. Prof Whiten points out that the chimpanzees are meticulous and careful to discard all but the inner pith.

The outer parts are so poisonous that they often kill domestic goats unfamiliar with the forest flora - indeed, it is known as “goat killer” by the Temme people of Sierra Leone. Learning how to take this medicine “requires close observation of what mother is doing,” he says.

Strikingly, self-medication is found in apes across Africa. This, says Prof Whiten, probably means “it is very ancient, culturally important and spread widely”.

Given that the common ancestor of chimpanzee and man lived six million years ago, the roots of medicine are indeed prehistoric.

Scientists discover bizarre lungless frog in Borneo

Monday, April 7th, 2008

So let’s get this straight– while greedy palm oil corporations are cutting down the forest faster than ever, scientists are still discovering new species of frogs in that same forest…. discoveries which will provide breakthroughs in our understanding of the complexities of life on earth…
The priorities seem to be a bit messed up here– dead orangutans and cheap cookies & soap… or healthy orangutans, intact forests and new scientific discoveries… kind of a no-brainer… so why aren’t the palm oil companies being stopped?????? Come on people, we need to get our act together and stop the madness…! ~ Rich

New Frog Discovered

By Charles Q. Choi

The first lungless frog has been discovered lurking in the jungles of Borneo.

The enigmatic amphibian, dubbed Barbourula kalimantanensis, apparently gets all the oxygen it needs through its skin.

Scientists first saw one of these frogs 30 years ago, but due to their rarity, just one other specimen had been collected since then and neither had been dissected.

Photo: David Bickford / LiveScience
Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23996711/

Decade Of The Mind III: Great Ape Trust To Gather Internationally Recognized Scientists For Symposium

Tuesday, April 1st, 2008

Internationally recognized research pioneers from a variety of disciplines will gather in Des Moines May 7-9 when Great Ape Trust of Iowa presents Decade of the Mind III: Emergence of the Mind, a groundbreaking symposium exploring the topics of consciousness and mind in nonhuman primates, with an emphasis on great apes.

The topics to be discussed in nine plenary sessions complement Great Ape Trust’s cognitive and behavioral research with nonhuman primates to better understand how a brain creates a mind, according to Dr. Rob Shumaker, co-organizer of the event and director of orangutan research at Great Ape Trust.

“Cognitive and behavioral research with nonhuman primates clearly demonstrates that many aspects of the mind assumed to be uniquely human are shared with humans’ closest living relatives,” said Dr. Karyl Swartz, also a co-organizer of the symposium and a scientist at Great Ape Trust. “Presently, the most relevant questions concerning these aspects of the mind may not be whether they are uniquely human; rather the questions to be answered revolve around the degree to which these cognitive skills are shared among human and nonhuman primates and by what mechanisms they emerge and develop. This provides a rich perspective for exploring how a brain creates a mind.”

Decade of the Mind III: Emergence of Mind is open to the public and there are no registration fees. Registrations are only accepted online at http://www.greatapetrust.org/decadeofthemind/ and limited to 200 attendees.

Dr. Giulio Tononi, a professor of psychiatry at University of Wisconsin-Madison and a pioneer in studies of the neural basis of consciousness and the function of sleep, will give the keynote address, “Consciousness and the Brain,” at the three-day symposium, the third in the Decade of the Mind series. Tononi’s breakthrough research includes a finding that the fading of consciousness during dreamless sleep seems to occur as the different regions of the cerebral cortex that mediate perception, thought and action become functionally disconnected.

Tononi will make his remarks on the opening night of the symposium at the Des Moines Art Center, 4700 Grand Ave., where all sessions will be held. A tour of Great Ape Trust facilities, followed by a reception and casual dinner, are also scheduled.

Other speakers are:

* Dr. James Olds, director of the Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va. The Krasnow Institute, one of Great Ape Trust’s scientific partners, presented the first Decade of the Mind symposium last year as part of its mission to expand understanding of mind, brain and intelligence with research conducted at the intersection of the separate fields of cognitive psychology, neurobiology, and the computer-driven study of artificial intelligence and complex adaptive systems. Olds’ session is titled “Decade of the Mind: The Spirit of Vannevar Bush.” Bush was an American engineer, inventor and politician who pioneered many of the concepts that later inspired the creation of hypertext and the World Wide Web.

* Dr. Roger K.R. Thompson, the Dr. E. Paul and Frances H. Reiff Professor in the Department of Psychology at Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, Pa. Thompson, whose session is titled “A Natural History of the Mind,” has studied sensory and memory processes in bottle-nosed dolphins, and focuses on researching and teaching comparative analysis of cognition with chimpanzees, old- and new-world monkeys, human infants and birds.

* Dr. Colin Allen, a professor in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at Indiana University in Bloomington. Allen has broad research interests in the philosophy of biology and cognitive science, but is best-kown for his work on animal behavior and cognition. His session is titled “How Hard is the Science of Animal Minds””

* Dr. Kathy Schick and Dr. Nicholas Toth, co-directors of the Stone Age Institute, an autonomous research facility with strong ties to Indiana University in Bloomington, co-directors of the Center for Research into the Anthropological Foundations of Technology, or CRAFT, and co-directors of the Human Evolutionary Studies Program. Experimental archaeologists, Schick and Toth focus their investigations of stone tool-making and tool-using behaviors of modern African apes and on the manufacture and use of early Paleolithic tools. Their session is titled “The Human Mind Evolving.”

* Dr. Anne Russon, a professor of psychology at Glendon College of York University, Toronto, Canada. Russon has been studying intelligence and learning in ex-captive Bornean orangutans rehabilitated and released to forest life since 1989 and is widely published on the subject of ape intelligence, and orangutan intelligence in particular. Her session is titled “The Evolution of Thought: Evolutionary Origins of Great Ape Intelligence.”

* Dr. Tetsuro Matsuzawa, a professor in the Language and Intelligence Section at the Primate Research Institute at Kyoto University in Japan. Matsuzawa’s research has focused on chimpanzee intelligence and tool use, both in the wild and in laboratory settings. His session is titled “Chimpanzee Mind: A Combining Effort of Fieldwork and Laboratory Work.”

* Dr. Robert Seyfarth, a professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. Seyfarth began his research with vervet monkeys in Kenya, and since 1992 has been involved in a study of communication, cognition and behavior among baboons in the Moremi Game Reserve, Bostwana. His session is titled “Baboon Metaphysics: The Evolution of a Social Mind.”

* Dr. Merlin Donald, professor emeritus in the Department of Psychology at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Donald is the author of two influential books: Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition and A Mind so Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness. He continues to focus academically on human cognitive evolution, especially on the complex interactions between mind, technology and culture.

The Decade of the Mind initiative follows the model established with Decade of the Brain, 1990-2000. During that period, quantum leaps in neuroscience spurred development of new technologies that gave researchers the tools to look non-invasively into the living, conscious brain and develop a blueprint of its structure.

The Decade of the Mind initiatives take this scientific inquiry further, providing greater understanding of how a brain creates a mind and how the mind thinks and acts. Such an understanding addresses vital U.S. interests, including but not limited to science, medicine, economic growth, security and well-being.

—————————-

—————————-

GREAT APE TRUST BACKGROUND

Great Ape Trust of Iowa is a scientific research facility in southeast Des Moines dedicated to understanding the origins and future of culture, language, tools and intelligence. When completed, Great Ape Trust will be the largest great ape facility in North America and one of the first worldwide to include all four types of great ape - bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans - for noninvasive interdisciplinary studies of their cognitive and communicative capabilities.

Great Ape Trust is dedicated to providing sanctuary and an honorable life for great apes, studying the intelligence of great apes, advancing conservation of great apes and providing unique educational experiences about great apes. Great Ape Trust of Iowa is a 501(c) 3 not-for-profit organization and is certified by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA). To learn more about Great Ape Trust of Iowa, go to http://www.greatapetrust.org/.

Source: Al Setka
Great Ape Trust of Iowa

Researchers identify language feature unique to human brain

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

Researchers at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, have identified a language feature unique to the human brain that is shedding light on how human language evolved. The study marks the first use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), a non-invasive imaging technique, to compare human brain structures to those of chimpanzees, our closest living relative. The study will be published in the online version of Nature Neuroscience.

To explore the evolution of human language, Yerkes researcher James Rilling, PhD, and his colleagues studied the arcuate fasciculus, a pathway that connects brain regions known to be involved in human language, such as Broca’s area in the frontal lobe and Wernicke’s area in the temporal lobe. Using DTI, researchers compared the size and trajectory of the arcuate fasciculus in humans, rhesus macaques and chimpanzees.

According to Rilling, “The human arcuate fasiculus differed from that of the rhesus macaques and chimpanzees in having a much larger and more widespread projection to areas in the middle temporal lobe, outside of the classical Wernicke’s area. We know from previous functional imaging studies that the middle temporal lobe is involved with analyzing the meanings of words. In humans, it seems the brain not only evolved larger language regions but also a network of fibers to connect those regions, which supports humans’ superior language capabilities.”

“This is a landmark,” said Yerkes researcher Todd Preuss, PhD, one of the study’s coauthors. “Until DTI was developed, scientists lacked non-invasive methods to study brain connectivity directly. We couldn’t study the connections of the human brain, nor determine how humans resemble or differ from other animals. DTI now makes it possible to understand how evolution changed the wiring of the human brain to enable us to think, act and speak like humans.”

Information Source: Emory University
Page Source: http://www.physorg.com/news125500956.html

Orangutans love to laugh!

Saturday, March 15th, 2008

bos_lone3.jpg

For people who have had the pleasure of seeing an orangutan in real life it is no surprise – but now scientists have made it clear: Feelings and responses like empathy, laughter and imitation do not only belong to humans but also our red-haired relatives.

Observations of orangutans made by scientists at the University of Portsmouth show that orangutans’ way of interacting with other relatives remind us so much of ourselves that there is good reason to believe that the apes had the feelings first.

bos_lone1.jpgFor Lone Dröscher Nielsen the discovery is not new; it is a daily experience at the Nyaru Menteng Orangutan Rehabilitation Center.

”Deep down I believe that people always knew it,” Lone says. “If they closed their eyes. If they admitted that the orangutans have feelings like humans, they would not be able to live with their fate and what we humans do to them”.

The empathetic abilities of the red apes are clearly seen in Lone’s daily routine.

“If one of the orangutan girls is being bothered by one of the male ‘bandits’ they all gang up to help the victim. Not a long time age Yasmin was captured by Hamlet and then they all joined together to save her. And the interesting thing was that the females were the most aggressive – as if they could imagine how Yasmin was feeling. A sort of woman-to-woman-thing,” Lone says with a laugh.

bos_lone2.jpgThat animals are working in groups is not new, but for orangutans it is not quite normal. They are by nature not group animals. Their social ability of familiarizing themselves makes it possible for them to put themselves in somebody’s place and empathize with them.

The studies from University of Portsmouth show that distinct expressions were picked up and copied by 25 orangutans at four different places.

Lone Dröscher Nielsen also experienced this. “If a young one watches another young one doing something getting people laughing, it imitates the first one. Exactly like small children,” she says. “And they also laugh when they are being tickled.”

Source: Borneo Orangutan Survival
Photos © Borneo Orangutan Survival

Anthropologists confirm link between diet and teeth of orangutans

Friday, March 14th, 2008

March 17, 2008
By Jennifer McNulty

For the first time, anthropologists at the University of California, Santa Cruz, have measured the mechanical properties of foods eaten in the wild by orangutans and chimpanzees to test assumptions about the link between diet and the teeth of primates.

Their findings confirm what researchers have assumed, providing the first data that correlates the thick enamel of orangutans with a diet of hard foods. The results have significant implications for the study of the diet of early human ancestors, because anthropologists have long noted similarities between the teeth of hominids and orangutans, which appear to have independently evolved thickly enameled teeth that are well-adapted to the consumption of hard or gritty foods.

The new study, which correlates differences in the teeth of chimpanzees and orangutans with differences in their diets, appears in the current online issue of the Journal of Human Evolution in a paper entitled, “Functional Ecology and evolution of Hominoid Molar Enamel Thickness: Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii and Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii.”

“Orangutans have really thick enamel on their teeth and ridges across the basin of their molars, compared to chimpanzees, which have much thinner enamel,” said Erin Vogel, associate researcher and lecturer in anthropology at UCSC. “Researchers have speculated for years about the function of this divergent morphology, but no one has ever measured the mechanical properties of their foods in the wild.”

In the field, Vogel and coauthor Nathaniel J. Dominy, assistant professor of anthropology at UCSC, systematically tested the foods eaten by orangutans and chimpanzees for hardness and toughness, uncovering differences that correlate with morphological differences in the two species’ teeth. The study features data gathered by Vogel during nearly a year she spent observing 21 orangutans in Borneo, and chimpanzee data gathered in Uganda by Dominy. Vogel and Dominy used a new standardized engineering technology to study the properties of foods, generating data that are truly comparable across different continents, a significant advance over previous studies of monkey foods.

Although orangutans and chimpanzees both prefer to eat ripe fruit, they turn to other sources of sustenance when fruit is unavailable. Those foods–called “fallback foods”–vary considerably and in ways that could explain why their teeth evolved so differently, said Vogel.

“When fruit is scarce, orangutans feed on foods that are harder and tougher than what chimps eat, including tree bark and really hard seeds that would probably crack the tooth of any other primate,” said Vogel. “By contrast, chimpanzees rely primarily on leaves during fallback periods, so they need those sharp blades formed by thin enamel to fracture the leaves.”

The findings indicate that fallback foods may have exerted selective pressure on tooth evolution, particularly on molar enamel. “For orangutans, those thick, ridged surfaces are a functional adaptation to the routine consumption of relatively tough and hard foods,” said Vogel, noting also that fruit isn’t consistently available in Southeast Asia, which prompts the apes to frequently supplement their diet with other foods.

The findings have implications for inferring the diet of early human ancestors, and they provide valuable comparative data for researchers exploring the diets of hominids. “We know early human ancestors had thicker enamel and very robust jaws, which this study indicates could have been adaptations to eating harder, gritty foods, including the underground storage organs of plants,” said Vogel. Dominy has conducted pathbreaking work on the diet of early humans, which his research suggests likely included bulbs, corms, and other underground plant parts.

The next phase of Vogel’s research will be to analyze the teeth and diets of orangutans on the island of Sumatra, where the apes eat fewer seeds and bark than those on Borneo. “Orangutans in Borneo have more robust jaws than those on Sumatra, which would seem to correlate with differences in their diets,” noted Vogel.

In addition to Vogel and Dominy, coauthors on the paper were Janneke T. van Woerden of the University of Utrecht; Peter W. Lucas of George Washington University; Sri S. Utami Atmoko of Universitas Nasional in Jakarta; and Carl P. van Schaik of the University of Zurich.

Source: http://www.ucsc.edu/news_events/text.asp?pid=2024

Scientists Criticize Use of Chimps in Media

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

Public More Likely to Think Chimps Aren’t Endangered Due to Wacky Portrayal in Movies and TV, Studies Say

By ASHLEY PHILLIPS

March 13, 2008 — From CareerBuilder commercials to “Lancelot Link,” a sitcom following the hijinks of a 1970s psychedelic detective agency, Hollywood has employed primates, particularly chimps, for years to make audiences laugh.

But according to conservationists, those smiles come with a dark side.

Constantly using chimps for laughs leads the TV- and movie-viewing public to mistakenly believe that the animals aren’t an endangered species, a group of scientists that includes Jane Goodall said this week in Science.

“My gut feeling is that there is some level of public trust in what’s allowed and what’s not. When you go to the grocery store, food is FDA approved. Nothing that you consume is going to be bad for your health,” said Kristen Lukas, curator of conservation and science at the Cleveland Metroparks Zoo and a co-author of the paper. “I think there’s that similar public trust that if you see something like this on TV, how bad could it be? If chimps are endangered, how could they be used this way?”

In 2005 and 2006, two separate studies conducted by two different conservation organizations found the same thing: Visitors were more likely to believe that gorillas and orangutans were endangered than chimps. When asked why, the visitors all pointed to the use of chimps in the media.

In 2005, visitors to the Regenstein Center for African Apes at the Lincoln Park Zoo in Chicago were surveyed to select the great ape species — chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans — that were considered endangered. The survey labeled the species to avoid confusion.

The results: 95 percent thought gorillas were endangered, 91 percent thought orangutans were endangered, but only 66 percent believed that chimpanzees were endangered.

When informed that chimps were endangered, 35 percent of the respondents said that they didn’t think chimpanzees were endangered because of their common portrayal in TV, movies and commercials.

In 2006, a similar study was repeated at the Great Ape Trust in Iowa in Des Moines with strikingly similar results. In this survey, 72 percent of respondents thought chimps were endangered compared to gorillas (94 percent) and orangutans (92 percent).

“This is the first evidence that links the inappropriate use of chimps in the media with these wider conservation attitudes that people hold about chimps in general,” said Steve Ross, the lead author of the paper and the supervisor of behavioral and cognitive research at the Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes at the Lincoln Park Zoo.

Ross said that he wasn’t surprised by the two surveys’ findings.

“We long suspected this inappropriate portrayal of chimps had this effect. … These results really bear that out,” he said. “This is a great opportunity … for scientists to use data to affect policy or popular perceptions.”

“These data can be very important in raising awareness of the issues and organizations that might consider this a viable advertising campaign — these types of campaigns have costs. You’re affecting people’s conservation attitudes.”

Lukas believes that because chimpanzees look so similar to humans, people relate more on a visceral level to them than other primates.

“There is something that people find just humorous when they see chimps portrayed this way,” Lukas said. “Orangutans look so different. With gorillas, people are more afraid of them because they’re so large and have that ‘King Kong’ thing going for them. Chimps are more vulnerable when it comes to this kind of messaging.”

Several animal actor agencies were unable to comment by deadline.

According to the World Wildlife Fund, there are currently at least 172,000 chimpanzees, 49,000 orangutans and more than 100,000 gorillas in the wild.

Source: http://www.abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=4444917&page=1

Close
E-mail It