'Science'

Ciao Bella: Tropical Europe’s last swamp age

Monday, September 15th, 2008

Prehistoric primate lived in what is now Tuscany

(ANSA) - Rome, September 15 - The Swamp Ape, a prehistoric primate that once inhabited part of Italy, is the focus of a conference looking at life in this area when it was a tropical island. The Swamp Ape, or Oreopithecus bambolii, developed some nine million years ago on an island that used to be part of modern-day Tuscany.

”This hominid is the only survivor of what was once tropical Europe,” explained Lorenzo Rook, who has been studying the creature for many years. Fossils of the ape, which is closely linked to the orangutan, were first discovered 50 years ago in Grosseto and on the island of Sardinia, near the western town of Sassari.

However, studies on the Swamp Ape have progressed slowly and it is only in the last few years that new breakthroughs have been made. ”We now know that it is not a relation of our most direct forebears,” said Rook, who works in the Earth Sciences Department of Florence University.

”Instead, it is one of the last members of a large group of human-like apes that were widespread in Europe and Asia during the late Miocene era,” which ended some 5.33 million years ago. Research suggests that oreopithecus bambolii lived in a swampy, tropical climate. It had long arms and fingers, probably to help it climb and swing, but also had adaptations suggesting it walked upright, making it among the earliest primates to do so. It had a small head and large eyes, and its teeth indicate it lived on a diet of berries, fruits and vegetables.

Crucially, it also had hands capable of manipulation similar to that of a human being.

According to Rook, it had more dexterity than any ape alive today and could handle objects with the same precision that was formerly thought to be the exclusive capability of homo sapiens and their direct ancestors. The Swamp Ape evolved in isolation from other animals on the tropical island, where it appeared to have had no natural predators. However, as sea levels fell with the Ice Age, a land bridge appeared, bringing with it dangerous new species, including large predators, which eventually wiped out the Swamp Ape. The conference under way in Florence seeks to draw out links among the many species of primate that once occupied Europe in ancient days.

”The Swamp Ape was a genuinely unique animal and the exact nature of its link to other primates is still the subject of much heated debate,” concluded Rook.

Source: http://www.ansa.it/site/notizie/awnplus/english/news/2008-09-15_115247973.html

Old-Growth Carbon Findings Cause Forest Protection Schism

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

New ecological science increases calls for forest protection movement to unite in campaign to protect all ancient forests.

September 11, 2008
By Earth’s Newsdesk, a project of Ecological Internet (EI)
Source: Earth’s Newsdesk, Ecological Internet

A new study in the journal Nature finds old-growth forests are “carbon sinks” and continually absorb carbon dioxide [1]. Australian researchers recently found logging primary forests releases 40 percent of their carbon [2]. These findings discredit decades of thought that primary forests are carbon neutral and only young forests continue to remove carbon.

The Earth’s remaining ancient forests need to be fully protected not just because destroying them will release huge stores of greenhouse gases while destroying biodiversity — but because science now knows what many of us intuited — they continue in perpetuity to absorb massive amounts of new carbon
dioxide. The environmental movement must respond accordingly.

This causes discomfort for groups like Greenpeace and the Rainforest Action Network (RAN) that actively support ancient forest logging. They campaign for certified industrial first-time harvest of primary forests, and to establish some protected areas, while acquiescing to ancient forest logging
elsewhere. They work to end coal use, but not ancient forest logging. New ecological science indicates their discredited forest campaigns cause climate change and block ecologically sufficient policies.

Thirty percent of global forests are unmanaged primary forests or regenerating old-growth forests. These ancient forests in Canada, Russia and Alaska alone absorb 1.3 gigatonnes of carbon annually, about ten percent of global emissions. Much of their carbon, including in the soil, “will move back to the
atmosphere if these forests are disturbed… Carbon accounting rules for forests should give credit for leaving old-growth forest intact,” conclude Oregon State University researchers in Nature.

Greenpeace and RAN — and virtually every major forest campaign — continue to focus upon establishing protected areas in some remaining wildernesses, and making first-time industrial logging less damaging elsewhere. After millennia of terrestrial ecosystem destruction by humans, and over a
century of failed logging reform, ecologically driven activists question the dominant failed paradigm that logging primeval forests can ever be justified. This has led to a major schism in the forest protection movement, which is not going to go away easily.

Both RAN and Greenpeace recently celebrated Ontario, Canada’s promise to protect Boreal Forests in coming decades in exchange for continued industrial development now. Since the announcement, plans to log old-growth forests in Ontario’s Temagami region have been fast-tracked, and logging giant
AbitibiBowater has taken the agreement as a green light to intensify logging. This occurs with Greenpeace and RAN’s blessing, because there may be some protections in 15 years.

Greenpeace activists last week boarded a logging ship in Papua New Guinea (PNG) to prevent Malaysian-owned logging company Rimbunan Hijau from exporting timber to China. “We need to
urgently protect these ancient forests to save our climate… Greenpeace is asking the PNG government to establish a moratorium on any new large-scale logging,” said campaigner Sam Moko. Given PNG’s two earlier, largely Greenpeace inspired, temporary moratoriums in past decades, that led to no changes in forest policy, perhaps Greenpeace should work to END ancient forest logging in PNG and globally, before the forests are gone.

Britain’s Prince Charles called yesterday for the world to act with a “sense of wartime urgency” to protect the rainforests, warning they were “umbilically connected” to the phenomenon of climate change. The heir to the British throne says rainforests “are the world’s lifebelt”, acting as the “world’s
air conditioning system” and helping store the largest body of flowing water on the planet. Such ambitious, ecologically-based policy is welcome from the nation that unleashed industrialism.

For over a decade, Ecological Internet (EI) — the world’s leading exclusively Internet-based forest and climate campaigners — has called for an end to all primary and old-growth forest logging as necessary to save the Earth’s climate and biodiversity. Active campaigns seek to end ancient forest logging in Tasmania, Australia and British Columbia, Canada.

EI has campaigned to have Greenpeace and RAN change their forest policies, and given current science, their hand to continue doing so has been strengthened.

The response has been nearly total silence, with some ridicule and questioning of motives. Yet, there are important discussions regarding how forests relate to global ecological sustainability that must be held, and EI and allies will persevere. Are there enough ancient forests remaining to sustain atmospheric processes? Can first time industrial logging of ancient forests ever be done carefully enough to maintain carbon, species and other values? Is wide-scale industrial development of primary forests acceptable if indigenous peoples so desire? Why are Greenpeace and RAN stonewalling such important questions?

According to EI President, Dr. Glen Barry, “Greenpeace and RAN must engage in public dialogue, and review their forest campaigns, to bring them up to date with ecological science and planetary conditions. Emphasis must be upon requirements to maintain the Earth’s atmosphere and all life’s habitats — regardless of difficulty — and this means leaving old-growth standing. Until all forest defenders embrace full protection for ancient forests, ecologically sufficient forest campaigns cannot succeed. Continued refusal makes Greenpeace and RAN legitimate targets of protest.”

###

[1] Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature 455, 213-215 (September 11, 2008).

[2] Green Carbon: The role of natural forests in carbon storage. ANU E Press (July 2008).

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE:
http://forests.org/blog/2008/09/feature-old-growth-carbon-find.asp

Source: Earth’s Newsdesk, Ecological Internet

Carbon Trading Around the World

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

Companies and governments are turning to emissions trading as a weapon to fight climate change, in a carbon market worth US$64 billion last year.

Cap-and-trade plans force participants — often energy-intensive industries — to buy permits to emit greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, which is produced from burning fossil fuels.

New Zealand’s parliament on Wednesday passed the Labour government’s climate change bill, which will introduce emissions trading from 2009.

The plan will eventually cover all emissions from the economy, but critics said it was too slow to phase in the crucial sectors such as agriculture, which makes up around half of the countries total emissions.

Australia’s leading climate guru Ross Garnaut last week said the Australian government should aim for an emissions cut of at least 10 percent by 2020 (based on 2000 levels), or up to 25 percent if a tougher target is adopted.

He also recommended that Aussie carbon prices be pegged at A$20 (US$16) a tonne from 2010, with only marginal increases for the first two years.

The 27-nation European Union launched its cap-and-trade scheme in 2005, while Canada is set to launch a market of its own in 2010.

US senators in June defeated a proposed federal US climate change bill which included cap and trade.

In another type of carbon market, countries and companies can trade carbon offsets under three, UN-led Kyoto Protocol schemes.

A full list of established and proposed schemes follows.

INTERNATIONAL PLANS

KYOTO PROTOCOL (United Nations) (1)

Launched: 2005

Mandatory for 37 developed signatory countries

Target: 5 percent reduction in 1990 emissions by 2008-2012

Contains three sub-schemes to help signatories meet targets:

1- Clean Development Mechanism (CDM): Developed countries can invest in clean energy projects in developing nations

2- Joint Implementation (JI): Rich countries can invest in clean energy projects in former communist countries or “economies in transition”

3- Assigned Amount Units (AAUs): Signatories can trade surplus emissions rights among themselves

First commitment period expires in 2012 and governments scrambling to negotiate a successor agreement.

EU ETS - European Union Emissions Trading Plan (2)

Launched: 2005 (Phase 1: 2005-2007, Phase 2: 2008-2012, Phase 3: 2013-2020)

Mandatory for 27 nations in EU

Covers around half of all EU emissions

Target: Reduce EU ETS emissions by 21 percent by 2020 compared to 2005 levels

Worth US$50 billion in 2007 (3)

PROPOSED NATIONAL PLANS

UNITED STATES

Mandatory cap-and-trade scheme proposed under Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act was rejected by the US Senate in June, but many observers expect either presidential candidate to introduce new climate legislation within first six months of their presidency.

CANADA (4)

Launch: 2010

Mandatory for all 10 provinces and three territories

Target: Reduce 2006 emissions by 20 percent by 2020

Plan covers 50 percent of Canada’s emissions

Potential problems: Alberta already has a provincial scheme and several provinces have joined US regional plans.

JAPAN (5)

Currently a voluntary plan (JVETS), and government trialling a mandatory scheme in autumn 2008.

Target: Cut emissions by 14 pct below current levels by 2020

JVETS (voluntary scheme) - Launched: 2005

Target: Cut emissions from a 2002-2004 average, using government-subsidized clean energy equipment

AUSTRALIA (6)

Launch: 2010

Mandatory - to cover 75 percent of Australian emissions

Target: First cap (2010-2012) to cut emissions to 8 percent above 1990 levels (Australia’s Kyoto target). Medium-term caps could be 10-25 percent below 2000 levels by 2020, while long-term targets “should reflect increasing levels of ambition” and move country towards an eventual goal of reducing 2000 emissions by 60 percent by 2050.

NEW ZEALAND (7)

Launch: Obligations start in 2008, trading starts in 2009

Mandatory - includes forestry in 2008, electricity in 2010, transport fuels (16 pct of total emissions) in 2011 and agricultural waste (47 pct of total emissions) from 2013.

Target: To be announced

Participants will receive permits representing 90 percent of 2005 emissions between 2013-2018. Free permits will then be phased out from 2019 to have full auctioning by 2029. Importing HFC and PFC offsets to be restricted until 2013, and using AAUs for compliance will only be allowed between 2008-2012.

Auckland’s TZ1 exchange has been appointed to be VCS (Voluntary Carbon Standard) registry.

Sources: (1) UNFCCC

(2) European Commission

(3) World Bank

(4) Environment Canada

(5) Japanese government

(6) Australian government

(7) New Zealand government, Barclays Capital (Compiled by Michael Szabo; Editing by David Fogarty)

About Death, Just Like Us or Pretty Much Unaware?

Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008

By NATALIE ANGIER
Published: September 1, 2008
Source: The New York Times

As anybody who has grieved inconsolably over the death of a loved one can attest, extended mourning is, in part, a perverse kind of optimism. Surely this bottomless, unwavering sorrow will amount to something, goes the tape loop. Surely if I keep it up long enough I’ll accomplish my goal, and the person will stop being dead.

Last week the Internet and European news outlets were flooded with poignant photographs of Gana, an 11-year-old gorilla at the Münster Zoo in Germany, holding up the body of her dead baby, Claudio, and pursing her lips toward his lifeless fingers. Claudio died at the age of 3 months of an apparent heart defect, and for days Gana refused to surrender his corpse to zookeepers, a saga that provoked among her throngs of human onlookers admiration and compassion and murmurings that, you see? Gorillas, and probably a lot of other animals as well, have a grasp of their mortality and will grieve for the dead and are really just like us after all.

Nobody knows what emotions swept through Gana’s head and heart as she persisted in cradling and nuzzling the remains of her son. But primatologists do know this: Among nearly all species of apes and monkeys in the wild, a mother will react to the death of her infant as Gana did — by clutching the little decedent to her breast and treating it as though it were still alive. For days or even weeks afterward, she will take it with her everywhere and fight off anything that threatens to snatch it away. “The only time I was ever mobbed by langurs was when I tried to inspect a baby corpse,” said the primatologist Sarah Hrdy. Only gradually will she allow the distance between herself and the ever-gnarlier carcass to grow.

Yes, we’re a lot like other primates, particularly the great apes, with whom we have more than 98 percent of our genes in common. Yet elaborate displays of apparent maternal grief like Gana’s may reveal less about our shared awareness of death than our shared impulse to act as though it didn’t exist. Dr. Hrdy, author of “Mother Nature” and the coming “Mothers and Others,” said it made adaptive sense for a primate mother to hang onto her motionless baby and keep her hopes high for a while. “If the baby wasn’t dead, but temporarily comatose, because it was sick or fallen from the tree, well, it might come back to life,” Dr. Hrdy said. “We’re talking about primates who have singleton births after long periods of gestation. Each baby represents an enormous investment for the mother.”

Everywhere in nature, biologists say, are examples of animals behaving as though they were at least vaguely aware of death’s brutal supremacy and yet unpersuaded that it had anything to do with them. Michael Wilson, an assistant professor of anthropology at the University of Minnesota who has studied chimpanzees at Jane Goodall’s research site in Gombe, said chimps were “very different from us in terms of what they understand about death and the difference between the living and the dead.” The Hallmark hanky moment alternates with the Roald Dahl macabre. A mother will try to nurse her dead baby back to life, Dr. Wilson said, “but when the infant becomes quite decayed, she’ll carry it by just one leg or sling it over her back in a casual way.”

Juvenile chimpanzees display signs of genuine grief when their mothers die. In one famous case in Gombe, when a matriarch of the troop named Flo died at the age of 50-plus years, her son, Flint, proved inconsolable. Flint was 8 years old and could easily have cared for himself, but he had been unusually attached to his mother and refused to leave her corpse’s side. Within a month, the son, too, died.

Yet adult chimpanzees rarely react with overt sentimentality to the death of another adult, Dr. Wilson said. As a rule, sick or elderly adults go off into the forest to die alone, he said, and those that die in company often do so at the hands of other adults, who “sometimes make sure the victim is dead, and sometimes they don’t,” he said. The same laissez-faire attitude toward death-versus-life applies to chimpanzee hunting behavior. “When they’re hunting red colobus monkeys, they will either kill the monkeys first or simply immobilize them and start eating them while they’re still alive,” Dr. Wilson said. “The monkey will continue screaming and thrashing as they pull its guts out, which is very unpleasant for humans who are watching.”

For some animals, the death of a conspecific is a little tinkle of the dinner bell. A lion will approach another lion’s corpse, give it a sniff and a lick, and if the corpse is fresh enough, will start to eat it. For others, a corpse is considered dangerous and must be properly disposed of. Among naked mole rats, for example, which are elaborately social mammals that spend their entire lives in a system of underground tunnels, a corpse is detected quickly and then dragged, kicked or carried to the communal latrine. And when the latrine is filled, said Paul Sherman of Cornell University, “they seal it off with an earthen plug, presumably for hygienic reasons, and dig a new one.”

Among the social insects, the need for prompt corpse management is considered so pressing that there are dedicated undertakers, workers that within a few minutes of a death will pick up the body and hoist or fly it outside, to a safe distance from hive or nest, the better to protect against possible contagious disease. Honeybees are such compulsive housekeepers that if a mouse or other large creature, drawn by the warmth or promise of honey, happens to make its way into the hive and die inside, the bees, unable to bodily remove it, will embalm it in resin collected from trees. “You can find mummified mice inside beehives that are completely preserved right down to their whiskers,” said Gene E. Robinson, professor of entomology at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign.

But all is not grim for those dead in tooth and claw. Researchers have determined that elephants deserve their longstanding reputation as exceptionally death-savvy beings, their concern for the remains of their fellows approaching what we might call reverence. Reporting in the journal Biology Letters, Karen McComb of the University of Sussex and her colleagues found that when African elephants were presented with an array of bones and other natural objects, the elephants spent considerably more time exploring the skulls and tusks of elephants than they did anything else, including the skulls of rhinoceroses and other large mammals.

George Wittemyer of Colorado State University and his colleagues described in Applied Animal Behavior Science the extraordinary reactions of different elephants to the death of one of their prominent matriarchs. “One female stood over the body, rocking back and forth,” Dr. Wittemyer said in an interview. “Others raised their foot over her head. Others touched their tusks to hers. They would do their behaviors, and then leave.”

They were saying goodbye, or maybe, Won’t you please come back home?

Republican VP Candidate Sarah Palin vs. Endangered Species

Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008

Shocking Choice by John McCain

WASHINGTON– Senator John McCain just announced his choice for running mate: Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska. To follow is a statement by Rodger Schlickeisen, president of Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund.

“Senator McCain’s choice for a running mate is beyond belief. By choosing Sarah Palin, McCain has clearly made a decision to continue the Bush legacy of destructive environmental policies.

“Sarah Palin, whose husband works for BP (formerly British Petroleum), has repeatedly put special interests first when it comes to the environment. In her scant two years as governor, she has lobbied aggressively to open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling, pushed for more drilling off of Alaska’s coasts, and put special interests above science. Ms. Palin has made it clear through her actions that she is unwilling to do even as much as the Bush administration to address the impacts of global warming. Her most recent effort has been to sue the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to remove the polar bear from the endangered species list, putting Big Oil before sound science. As unbelievable as this may sound, this actually puts her to the right of the Bush administration.

“This is Senator McCain’s first significant choice in building his executive team and it’s a bad one. It has to raise serious doubts in the minds of voters about John McCain’s commitment to conservation, to addressing the impacts of global warming and to ensuring our country ends its dependency on oil.”

UK think tank: Preventing peatland loss is cheapest climate measure

Friday, August 29th, 2008

Source: Wetlands International

The UK think thank Policy Exchange has presented the costs of the most important climate measures. Reducing emissions from tropical peatlands is by far the cheapest way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions; using biofuels is by far the most expensive measure.

The study ‘The Root of the Matter’ shows the magnitude of emissions due to peatland and forest loss. Costs for reducing these emissions range from 0,1 euro per tonne carbon dioxide for peatlands to maximum 30 euro for forests. The costs for nuclear energy, the use of hydrogen and especially biofuels are much higher, up to around 600 euro per tonne.

The environmental NGO Wetlands International welcomes the recommendation of the authors to provide much more support to peatland restoration in tropical regions. This is currently a major work field for our organisation.

Peatland restoration

The study confirms the outcomes of studies of Wetlands International and supports our case to give much more attention to the emissions from peatlands in international climate policies (UN-FCCC). Currently, peatlands emissions are largely ignored. They are rarely reported and there are no incentives to reduce the enormous CO2 emission from tropical peatlands.

Read the study (pdf)

What Binti Jua Knew

Friday, August 15th, 2008

By Barbara J. King

Barbara J. King is a professor of anthropology at the College of William and Mary and is the author of “Evolving God: A Provocative View on the Origins of Religion.”

A toddler falls over a railing, 24 feet down, into the gorilla enclosure of the Brookfield Zoo outside Chicago. There he lies, unconscious, among seven apes, some with poundage and power exceeding that of an adult man. As one of them approaches the boy, onlookers tense.

But Binti Jua, an 8-year-old female gorilla, picks up the boy, and, carrying him along with her own infant, gently hands him over to zoo staff.

This stunning event in 1996 earned Binti Jua global headlines (and can be seen, if in grainy video, on YouTube). It was an incident that no one who witnessed it — in person or online — could forget. But there was nothing about Binti Jua, or any of the chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas or orangutans that exhibit reasoning and empathy, in Russell Paul La Valle’s July 27 op-ed, ” Why They’re Human Rights.”

La Valle argued that the Spanish Parliament should not award human rights to apes, as it is considering. He opened with a throwaway line about monkeys in the circus — and made his first mistake. First of all, monkeys’ bodies are smaller than those of apes, their thinking is less complex and they are more distantly related to humans. But a far more serious error was La Valle’s assertion that apes are “irrational, amoral.”

In an echo of 17th-century philosopher Rene Descartes’ dualism, La Valle invoked a strict dividing line between humans, who reason, and animals that rely on “instinctual, inherited knowledge of how to survive.” It’s clear that La Valle hasn’t spent much time with apes lately — or looking into any of the major findings by primate scientists over the past two or three decades. In expressing reasoning and empathy, Binti Jua was not unique; nor was her behavior an artifact of zoo life. Wild chimpanzees plan ahead and carry tools to work sites, where they crack open hard-shelled nuts with wood and stone hammers. They choose sides thoughtfully in ongoing competitions for status and reward friends’ loyalties while exacting revenge on their enemies. When close companions suffer wounds or injuries, wild chimpanzees groom and care for them.
ad_icon

(This compassion by chimpanzees, it must be said, is at times matched by their outright cruelty to each other. What species does that remind you of?)

Captive orangutans modify their own gestures according to how much a human companion seems to comprehend their requests. Bonobos use a symbol-laden computer keyboard to discuss with their caretakers plans for the day, as well as to make promises about being “good.”

The apes that I have described, and many more that my fellow primatologists write about, are neither irrational nor amoral. The zoologist and ethologist Frans de Waal has argued that the origins of morality can be found in our primate cousins, and my own anthropological work suggests that the evolutionary roots of today’s human religiosity can be found in the ape world.

It’s important to correct La Valle’s misunderstanding of apes, but not because I’m a fervent supporter of legalizing rights for animals. The question is complex and arguable: whether to award rights to apes or to assume responsibility for apes’ welfare. But while writers such as La Valle bandy words about and academics such as I discuss the philosophical aspects of rights, the great apes are dying.

The combined forces of poaching, diseases such as ebola fever, habitat destruction and the trade in bushmeat are killing off the apes at unprecedented rates. If we write them off as irrational and amoral animals, we will fail to grasp the depth of their suffering at the hands of our own species — a suffering that is cognitive and emotional as well as physical.

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/14/AR2008081403049.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

Untouched Natural Forests Store Three Times More Carbon

Friday, August 8th, 2008

Please visit the source of this article: The Forest Protection Portal
http://forests.org/blog/2008/08/untouched-natural-forests-stor.asp

An important new Australian study, reported upon in a new book entited “Green Carbon:The role of natural forests in carbon storage”, finds that “untouched natural forests store three times more carbon dioxide [ark] than previously estimated and 60 percent more than plantation forests” and that first-time “logging resulted in more than a 40 percent reduction in long-term carbon compared with unlogged forests.” They conclude that “in Australia and probably globally the carbon carrying capacity of natural forests [search] is underestimated and therefore misrepresented in economic valuations and in policy options.”

This resoundingly confirms Ecological Internet’s forest campaign’s key principle: sustaining intact ancient primary forests, by virtue of their holding of carbon and species, is a requirement for global ecological sustainability. This Earth Action Network’s shared commitment to ending ancient primary and old-growth forest logging has been validated by the emerging ecological science. And we hope this motivates you to continue taking action and to participate regularly in future email protest campaigns.

What does this mean for the forest and climate protection movement? It means if you — like Greenpeace and WWF — support first-time Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) industrial logging of ancient, primary forests and establishment of mono-culture plantations that replace regenerating natural forests; you are aiding and abetting the destruction of the Earth’s climate and biodiversity. It means that if you are working for avoided deforestation and forests’ inclusion in carbon markets, and not specifying payments will be made only for strict forest protections and not for first-time industrial management, you are failing both the climate and ancient forests. Or if you work to set-up a carbon market while you allow your own ancient forests to be logged — as Australia does — you will not succeed in reducing emissions. Each of these activities has been the target of recent Ecological Internet campaigns.

Or perhaps most troublingly, if like Rainforest Action Network and ForestEthics, you continually negotiate away large primary forests to industrial forestry for vague promises of protection elsewhere — as was done in Canada’s Great Bear Rainforest and most recently with the sell-out of 50% of Ontario’s Boreal forests — you are greenwashing the destruction of the Earth and all her life. Years after the Great Bear sell-out, senior RAN management thought they had achieved FSC certification, when in fact it was just vague promises of “ecosystem based management”. Such ecological ignorance cannot be tolerated by these self-appointed representatives of ancient forests and the Earth.

The era of first-time industrial logging of ancient primary forests is over. This is the motivation of our most recent Clayoquot Sound alert. There 93% of Vancouver Island’s ancient primary temperate rainforests have been destroyed, yet FSC apologists such as EcoTrust and ForestEthics work for “certified logging” of the rest, which we now know releases huge amounts of carbon.

Most of the mainstream and even “radical” environmental movement simply have their ecological science wrong. They have falsely accepted the comforting yet unproven notion that achieving environmentally advantageous industrial forest management in primary forests is possible, and is a better climate and forest conservation campaign strategy than working for full, complete protection of all remaining primary forests from industrial forestry. Ecological Internet has concluded quite the opposite — that it is better to work for what is needed and sufficient, even if we risk failure, than to accept what is insufficient and actually enables the ecological damage, even if achieved.

As the science continues to crystallize that all industrial logging of primary forests releases huge amounts of carbon and thus the purported environmental benefits are a myth, Ecological Internet will continue our campaign targeting FSC logging apologists including those previously named. Their putrid efforts to legitimize continued ancient forest logging is shameful — particularly in the face of impassioned yet reasoned, ecological science based opposition — and they must stop, and work to end ancient forest logging while restoring natural forests with old-growth characteristics. Or they are the forest and climate crises.

We expect those in the environmental movement that support FSC certified logging to immediately respond to the ecological science, and justify their continued apologist behavior for loss of primary forests, and its impact upon climate. Failure to do so will mean continued campaigns including disruption of their self-congratulatory campaigns and events.

British scientist hopes for ‘yeti hair’ breakthrough

Tuesday, July 29th, 2008

Once upon a time, there were 8-foot orangutans all over Asia. Gigantopithicus lives! ~Rich

###

LONDON - A British scientist said Monday he was anxiously awaiting the results of DNA tests on hair claimed to be from a yeti after initial examinations showed it had human and ape-like characteristics.

Ian Redmond, a biologist and expert in ape conservation, said the hairs found in the Indian jungle resembled samples collected by the conqueror of Everest, Sir Edmund Hillary, in the 1950s.

“Under the microscope, they look slightly human, slightly like an orangutan and slightly like the hairs brought back by Edmund Hillary,” Redmond told AFP.

“These hairs remain an enigma. They could be a new species, but the DNA tests will hopefully tell us more.”

The hairs were brought back from India this year by a BBC journalist, Alastair Lawson, who contacted Redmond and was put in touch with a team at Oxford Brookes University in south central England.

Lawson was given the hairs by yeti believer Dipu Marak, who retrieved them them in dense jungle in the Meghalaya state of India after a forester allegedly spotted the creature on three consecutive days in 2003.

Marak believes the hairs come from an ape-like Indian version of the fabled yeti, or abominable snowman, called mande barung, which he believes stands about three metres (10 feet) tall.

Redmond and scientists from Oxford Brookes examined the hairs on Thursday under powerful microscopes, comparing them with samples taken from an Asiatic black bear, yaks, orang utangs and gorillas at Oxford’s Natural History Museum and even a hair from Redmond’s beard.

“The hairs are complete with the cuticle, and between 3.3 centimetres (1.3 inches) and 4.4 centimetres long and thick and wiry and curved,” Redmond said.

“At one point we thought they looked like they came from a wild boar. That was quite a tense moment, but when we got a sample from the museum it turned out they were quite different.”

Redmond also contacted the English laboratory that analysed the hairs brought back by Hillary in the 1950s from his Everest expedition and found they were similar in appearance.

While the microscope tests were inconclusive, the hairs are now undergoing DNA tests in separate laboratories in Oxford and Cardiff.

Redmond admitted his excitement at a potential scientific breakthrough was tinged with fear.

“My concern is that if we do find something unusual, it will be from a very small population of animals and I would want to talk to the state government and Indian government so they are not inundated with people trying to catch one for a museum.

“I want us to approach this in a 21st century and not a 19th century way.”

Source: http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=53d0de91-9681-417b-9555-b4531dbb6522

Wild orangutans treat pain with natural anti-inflammatory

Monday, July 28th, 2008

Matt Walker
NewScientist.com news service

Source: http://www.newscientist.com/

Wild orangutans have been spotted using naturally occurring anti-inflammatory drugs.

Four individuals have been seen rubbing a soothing balm onto their limbs, the first known examples of orangutans self medicating. Great apes have never before been seen using drugs in this way. Remarkably though, local people use the same balm, administering it in a similar way to treat aches and pains.

Primatologist Helen Morrogh-Bernard, of the University of Cambridge, UK, made the discovery while studying Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in the Sabangau Peat Swamp Forest in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.

In 2005, she witnessed an adult female pick a handful of leaves from a plant and then chew them, mixing the leaves with her saliva to produce a green-white lather. The female then scooped up some of the lather with her right hand and applied it up and down the back of her left arm, from the base of the shoulder to the wrist, just as a person would apply sunscreen.

“She was concentrating on her arm only and was methodical in the way she was applying the soapy foam,” says Morrogh-Bernard. “I knew this must be some form of self-medication.”

After using the leaves, the orangutan dropped them, allowing Morrogh-Bernard and her assistant to find out what they were. The leaves belong to a genus called Commelina, a group of plants that orangutans do not eat as part of their normal diet. However, local indigenous people know the plant well, grinding it into a balm and applying it to their skin to treat muscular pain, sore bones and swellings.

Chimpanzees and gorillas are thought to self medicate, mainly by swallowing rough leaves or chewed plant pith to help flush out intestinal parasites. A few monkey species and one species of lemur are known to rub concoctions, such as tobacco, onion or garlic onto their fur to repel insects or parasites. But wild great apes have never before been seen rubbing ointments onto their fur.

Morrogh-Bernard, who has since seen three other orangutans using the plant in the same way, says the finding “links apes and humans directly”.

The apes may not have learnt how to apply the anti-inflammatory ointment from local people, she says, but perhaps ancestors of the indigenous population learnt about the drug from the apes.

Journal Reference: International Journal of Primatology (DOI:10.1007/s10764-008-9266-5)

Perth Zoo orangutan gives WA eye surgeon vision

Saturday, July 26th, 2008

Nic White

July 26, 2008 06:00pm

PERTH Zoo orangutan Hsing Hsing has provided valuable insight to the eye surgeon who battled to save his eye.
Bill Morgan said he was “dumbfounded” by how similar its eyes were to humans.

“If I hadn’t seen his face, I would have thought I was looking at a human eye. The tissue and nerves looked exactly the same,” he said.

More pics of Hsing Hsing in theatre

Prof Morgan and four other specialists from the Lions Eye Institute donated their time and expertise to the zoo to help cure the 33-year-old ape of glaucoma.

“It was an enormously interesting opportunity, but as we do animal research we thought it was a great way to give back what we have learnt from animals,” he said.

But the eye had to be removed when surgeons found it had suffered 98 per cent vision loss and was causing the primate pain and discomfort.

Prof Morgan said an operation to halt the glaucoma’s progress had only a 40 per cent chance of success and would not have restored any sight.

Hsing Hsing was diagnosed with type two diabetes in 1997 but showed almost no sign of diabetic damage to the eye.

“It’s a testament to the zoo’s management of his condition, I was very surprised,” Prof Morgan said.

Source: http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21598,24081261-2761,00.html

Efforts Underway To Save Thousands Of Species Of Wild Orchids In Borneo From Extinction

Thursday, July 17th, 2008

So goes the forest…. and everything in it!
Palm oil must be stopped!

ScienceDaily (July 17, 2008) — Borneo (Kalimantan) is the third largest island in the world. It is rich with a variety of indigenous orchid species that grow in the forests. Borneo’s rain forests are also home to some extremely rare species of orchids, all highly valued for their exotic aromas and aesthetic beauty. It has been estimated that 2500 to 3000 orchid species grow in the forests of Borneo.

Borneo’s orchids are also endangered, a result of the loss of natural habitat from fire, forest damage, and illegal logging. Increased exploitation of the forests of West Borneo, including gold mining and illegal burning, has led to the certain extinction of hundreds of orchid species. According to a Global Forest Watch 2002 report, Indonesia is experiencing one of the most dramatic losses of forestland in the world. Reports showed that at the current rate of loss, Borneo’s forests could vanish completely by 2010.

Economic factors, including illegal collecting and selling of wild orchids by domestic or foreign “orchid hunters”, along with increasing consumer demand for orchids, also contribute to the endangerment of Borneo’s native orchids.

Compelled by concern for the demise of Borneo’s native orchids, Chairani Siregar of the College of Agriculture at the University of Tanjungpura (Indonesia) undertook a 3-year study to locate and record endangered native orchid species in West Borneo. According to Siregar, “until recently, there were few records kept of the orchids native to West Borneo. For this reason, research was conducted to identify and create an inventory of all orchid species that exist (in West Borneo) before they and their habitats become extinct. The study was done in 10 counties and one municipal city in West Borneo. Orchids found were identified and recorded by species. A total of 197 species of orchids were identified.”

Siregar is committed to cultivating all vulnerable and endangered species of orchids before they become extinct, adding that “local government intervention and participation in conservation, cultivation and marketing of orchids are necessary” for the popular flowers’ survival.

Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080717110241.htm